James Colton - Justice Online

English Justice is Injustice

Nemo tenetur prodere seipsum

(‘no one is obliged to accuse himself)

youyube icon

Youtube Channel



Arrested Again by Dorset Police

Its 8.30am the 10 May 2009, Norfolk Police raid my home on the orders of Dorset Police who charge me with sexual offence against two stepdaughters, Tracey Gore and her sister Fleur Thompson. The charges are the very same allegations used at my divorce. Still wearing my dressing gown, I am pushed into the lounge. They discover I am growing one cannabis plant so more cops are called for.

The police are everywhere in my apartment, going through my belongings, bagging up the cannabis plant and seizing my kitchen scales and other items of evidence. I ask if I can make a phone call and firmly told no. I have two phone lines so I press the quick dial number on one, which dials a friend in Canada. Standing by my desk. I can hear her saying hello several times. She then dials my other number it rings, Can I answer that? Yes states the cop. Whats up she asks I tell her I have been arrested again and will be taken to Bournemouth. We have a short conservation; agree to keep in touch we hang up.

I sat down on an armchair, before me is my coffee table which is strewn with papers, cups and other junk. I spy a small heap of powered cannabis, which I had emptied the night before from my grinder. Can I smoke? I ask the officer, sure he replies.  With all the hassle of what I knew was an unlawful arrest, I needed calming.

They want it to be true.

Pathological lying isn’t a clinical diagnosis, though it can sometimes be a symptom of other issues, such as a personality disorder or a manic episode.

But some people get so accustomed to lying that they do so even when there is no clear purpose, and when their lies are  easily disproven, leaving everyone scratching their heads over the point of their deceptions.

Dorset Police execute a fake search warrant that has been issued unlawfully by Weymouth Magistrates Court.


When does a criminal trial become so overwhelmingly corrupt that its exposure would likely lead to a breakdown of the entire justice system.

Perhaps this is an emphasised claim; nevertheless, it does highlight the question of how safe are criminal trials in England? There is no transparency in English Courts.

In proving corruption, it is first necessary to provide evidence. Something may look like corruption; it may smell like corruption; it may feel like corruption. And hell, it may even taste like corruption. Nevertheless, to prove that it is corruption goes beyond outward appearances or senses.

Corruption can pollute any level of the justice system (UK), including the police and the Court administration. Proving a charge of corruption against someone or in my case a whole bunch of people can often be tricky because the people involved will naturally be secretive about their actions.

Let me put it this way. You are, arrested on criminal charges. Held on remand when you have the legal right to bail. You have the right to legal representation, but your lawyers will act against you as the second prosecutor, in doing so they refuse to have any contact with you.

The trial judge has evidence that fully exonerates you of the alleged crimes, which he withholds at your trial, he also orders every reference you made in your police interview that refers to this evidence be removed from the transcript.  The jury is rigged.  This is the basics of your trial. You are not fully competent in the law but you know you were being set-up, the trial was unlawful, what do you do?

I was, charged for alleged sexual abuse of two stepdaughters some 20-30 years previous. The charges were the same used at my divorce in 2000. However, this was, a smoke screen to cover-up my Internet activity, which exposed the lies told by my ex-wife and her two daughters. I produced a video Crooked Cops and Lame Horses and distributed this throughout Dorset some week earlier.

However, providing evidence of possible corruption, became a whole lot easier by exposing answers to my complaints against those involved in my trial. Following on It becomes necessary to establish the law, legal procedures in matters related to my trial

Simply put my lawyers refused to represent me by refusing to make a Defence Statement, call witnesses etc.


Dorset Police

Dorset police are happy protecting fraudsters


Home | About | Probation | Dorset Police | NEWS | Downloads | Disclaimer | The Law | Big Lie | Theresa May | Your Stories |